Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Neue Mechanismen für den Ernstfall

Neue Mechanismen für den Ernstfall

A new "Crisis Science Hub (CSH)" is supposed to facilitate rapid and structured cooperation between science and politics in future crisis. This is the recommendation of the developers of the Crisis Science Project (CRISP) initiated by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Irene Broer from the Leibniz Institute for Media Research (HBI) was part of the team as an expert in science communication.

The final paper has been published, in which the authors explain what is important for a successful crisis management and how a new institution like the Crisis Science Hub (CSH) could help.

"In times of crisis, quick assessments are needed," says Irene Broer. "But in most cases, scientific expertise cannot be easily applied to practical problems. Our task was to develop new mechanisms to facilitate communication between science and public administration that promote informed decision-making when time is of the essence."

Development Team with HBI Support

Irene Broer supported the project with her expertise for four months. The interdisciplinary and intersectoral development team of administrators, scientists and civil society members analysed crisis situations and developed new formats and prototypes using methods of design thinking. The focus was on different forms of communication and cooperation between science and politics. 

"It was important to us not to deny the complexity of the scientific advisory process, but to give it a home," said Irene Broer. "In the Crisis Science Hub that we proposed, scientists and administrators pursue co-creative approaches to jointly develop an understanding of the underlying problem situations and options for action."

Irene Broer has been researching editorial practices of science communication in Germany at the HBI since 2018. Findings from the project "Kommunikation in Krisen" [Communication in Crises], which analysed the interaction between different groups of actors, including science and government, during the Corona pandemic, were particularly relevant for her work in the CRISP team.

Photo by charlesdeluvio on Unsplash


Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.