Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Dipl.-Jur. Univ. Kevin Dankert

Dipl.-Jur. Univ. Kevin Dankert

Junior Researcher Broadcasting & Regulation

Kevin Dankert, Dipl.-Jur. Univ., studied law at the University of Hamburg with a focus on information and communication. His research interests include both private and public media law. He has been a student assistant at the Hans-Bredow-Institute since 2011. From February 2014 to the end of March 2018, he was working as a research assistant at the institute. His dissertation, supervised by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz, deals with the action-guiding effect of online usage environments and their regulation.

Dipl.-Jur. Univ. Kevin Dankert

Junior Researcher Broadcasting & Regulation

Send Email

Research activties by Dipl.-Jur. Univ. Kevin Dankert

Projects
Publications
Presentations
Teachings
All
Top_MedienKommunikationsberichtBundesregierung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Encompassing report

Report on Communications and Media 2016/2017

The Hans-Bredow-Institut has written the academic report on the current development of media in Germany for the Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien [German Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media]. The report provides significant parts to the Federal Governme...
Macht der Informationsmediäre Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen und Regulierungsoptionen -Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Manifestations and Regulatory Options

The Power of Information Intermediaries

In support of the political discourse on services like search engines and social networking services, this report provides a structured view on information intermediaries and  possible approaches of regulating them.  
311603_Media-Pluralism-Monitor_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Media Pluralism in the EU

Indicators of Media Pluralism in the EU: Media Pluralism Monitor

What is happening with media pluralism within the EU? How do different countries perform in comparison and what risks can be identified? The comparative study “Media Pluralism Monitor” addressed these questions, as commissioned by the European Commission. It eveluated and compared m...
229907_Code-Internetregulierung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Cooperation with HIIG

Regulating Code

The more time people spend online, the more important the code that controls their behaviour on digital platforms will become. This factor especially competes with regulation by law and poses new challenges to it.  
331402_MIRACLE_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Pilot Project

MIRACLE - Interoperable Age Classifications

Age classifications of media content vary from country to country. Moreover, many age classification labels cannot be processed automatically by computers. The EU-co-funded pilot project MIRACLE intends to digitalise all age classification labels so that all labels speak the same language.
10_Konvergenz-Nutzerperspektive-Kommunikationsmodi_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Problems and Possible Solutions

Convergence Report

Increasing technical convergence presents media regulation with new challenges and calls into question traditional media law. The report by Winfried Kluth and Wolfgang Schulz gives an overview of problem areas and provides possible solutions, as commissioned by the German states and as a preparation...
331304_Gute-Praxis-im-Jugendmedienschutz_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

International Comparison

Youth Media Protection: Good Practice in International Comparison

Traditional forms of protecting children against harmful media content are increasingly reaching its limits. An international comparison shows how 14 countries are coping with regulatory challenges.  
BigData_HR.png

With Contributions by the Institute

Big Data – Regulative Herausforderungen

Hoffmann-Riem, W. (ed.) (2018):  Big Data  –  Regulative Herausforderungen [Regulative Challenges]. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschafft. Edited by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, LL.M. With contributions by Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Gerrit Hornung, Yoan Hermstrüwer, An...

Verfälschung von Datenbeständen durch Social Bots

Dankert, K. (2018): Verfälschung von Datenbeständen durch Social Bots [Falsification of Databases by Social Bots]. In: W. Hoffmann-Riem (eds.), Big Data - Regulative Herausforderungen [Big Data - Regulatory Challenges]. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 157-166.
Software-Takes-Command_Hans-Bredow.-Institut.png

Autonomie und Determinismus. Was sagt das Grundgesetz zu Alltagsentscheidungen durch Software?

Dankert, K.; Dreyer, S. (2017): Autonomie und Determinismus. Was sagt das Grundgesetz zu Alltagsentscheidungen durch Software? [Autonomy and Determinism. What Does the Basic Law Think about Day-to-Day-Decisions by Software?] In: S. Eder, C. Mikat, A. Tillmann (eds.), Software Takes Command. Herausfo...
Social Bots

Social Bots – Grenzenloser Einfluss auf den Meinungsbildungsprozess?

Dankert, K,.; Dreyer, S. (2017): Social Bots – Grenzenloser Einfluss auf den Meinungsbildungsprozess? [Social Bots - Unlimited Impact on Opinion Formation?] In: Kommunikation und Recht, Issue 2, pp. 73-78.

Social Bots – Grenzenloser Einfluss auf den Meinungsbildungsprozess? Eine verfassungsrechtliche und einfachgesetzliche Einordnung

Dankert, K.; Dreyer, S. (2017): Social Bots – Grenzenloser Einfluss auf den Meinungsbildungsprozess? Eine verfassungsrechtliche und einfachgesetzliche Einordnung [Social Bots - Unlimited Influence on Processes of Opinion Formation? A Constitutional and Simple Legal Classification]. In: Kommuni...
Macht-der-Informationsintermediaere_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Die Macht der Informationsintermediäre – Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen, Regulierungsoptionen

Schulz, W.; Dankert, K. (2016): Die Macht der Informationsintermediäre – Erscheinungsformen, Strukturen, Regulierungsoptionen  [The Power of Information Intermediaries – Manifestations, Structures and Regulatory Options]. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Governance by Things

Schulz, W.; Dankert, K. (2016): 'Governance by Things' as a Challenge to Regulation by Law. In: Internet Policy Review 5 (2). DOI: 10.14763/2016.2.409 (online).

Identifikation von Good Practice im Jugendmedienschutz im internationalen Vergleich (Final Report)

Schulz, W.; Dreyer, S.; Dankert, K.; Puppis, M.; Künzler, M.; Wassmer, Chr. (2015): Identifikation von Good Practice im Jugendmedienschutz im internationalen Vergleich. Bericht im Rahmen des nationalen Programms Jugend und Medien [Identification of Good Practice in Youth Media Protection in Int...

Stellungnahme zu den Drucksachen 18/1761 und 18/1834 des Landtags Schleswig-Holstein zur Weiterentwicklung des NDR-Staatsvertrags

Schulz, W.; Dankert, K. (2015): Stellungnahme zu den Drucksachen 18/1761 und 18/1834 des Landtags Schleswig-Holstein zur Weiterentwicklung des NDR-Staatsvertrags [Statement on the Printed Matter 18/1761 and 18/1834 of the Landtag of Schleswig-Holstein on the Further Development of the NDR State...

Normative Technologie in sozialen Netzwerkdiensten

Dankert, K. (2015): Normative Technologie in sozialen Netzwerkdiensten – Neue Machtstrukturen als Anreiz für einen Paradigmenwechsel der Kommunikationsregulierung? [Normative Technology in Social Network Services - Do New Power Structures Incite a Paradigm Shift in Communication Regu...

Stellungnahme zum Entwurf eines novellierten Landesmediengesetzes und Telemedienzuständigkeitsgesetzes Nordrhein-Westfalen

Schulz, W., Dankert, K. (2014): Stellungnahme zum Entwurf eines novellierten Landesmediengesetzes und Telemedienzuständigkeitsgesetzes Nordrhein-Westfalen [Statement on the Draft of an Amended State Media Law and the Act on Competences of Telemedia of North Rhine-Westphalia] (pdf).

The Power of Defaults

"The Power of Defaults", presentation by K. Dankert at the "Symposium on Big Data and Data Governance", organised by the Law and Technology Centre of Hong Kong University in co-operation with the Hans-Bredow-Institut on 14 October 2016 in Hong Kong, China.

Rundfunkverfassungsrecht in Deutschland, Trennung von Staat und Medien [Broadcasting Law in Germany, Separation of the State and the Media]

"Rundfunkverfassungsrecht in Deutschland, Trennung von Staat und Medien [Broadcasting Law in Germany, Separation of the State and the Media]", lecture by K. Dankert at the conference "Medienfreiheit, Deutschland, Polen, Ukraine [Media Freedom, Germany, Poland, Ukraine]" of the In...

Good Practices of Youth Media Protection: An International Comparison

"Good Practices of Youth Media Protection: An International Comparison“, presentation by S. Dreyer, W. Schulz und K. Dankert at the 5th European Communication Conference (ECREA) on 15 November 2014 in Lissboa, Portugal (together with M. Puppis and M. Künzler).
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!