Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Transparency or Opacity

Transparency or Opacity

Martin Fertmann, together with Simone Kuhlmann, Fabrizio De Gregorio, Hannah Ofterdinger and Anton Sefkow, has published an anthology with contributions from legal scholars on the problem of transparency in automated decision-making processes.

The anthology is available as an open access publication in the eLibrary of Nomos Verlag.

You can access the publication here

Summary
The datafication and digitalisation of business models and decision-making processes have led to calls for more transparency, but at the same time raise the question of suitable concepts for this. The contributions summarised in this volume, which address various areas of law, therefore examine from a jurisprudential perspective whether and under what conditions transparency should be granted and to what extent already existing transparency concepts can be made fruitful. They are all discussion contributions of the 2nd Conference of the Research Network Young Digital Law, which took place on 22 and 23 July 2022 at the University of Hamburg.

Dr. Tobias Mast contributes to this volume with the article "Zum Wesensunterschied menschlicher und maschineller Entscheidungsbegründungen aus rechtssoziologischer Perspektive" [On the Difference in the Nature of Human and Machine Decision-Making from the Perspective of the Sociology of Law].

 
Kuhlmann, S.; De Gregorio, F.; Fertmann, M.; Ofterdinger, H.; Sefkow, A. (eds.) (2023): Transparency or Opacity, Baden-Baden. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748936060

Transparency or Opacity

Martin Fertmann, together with Simone Kuhlmann, Fabrizio De Gregorio, Hannah Ofterdinger and Anton Sefkow, has published an anthology with contributions from legal scholars on the problem of transparency in automated decision-making processes.

The anthology is available as an open access publication in the eLibrary of Nomos Verlag.

You can access the publication here

Summary
The datafication and digitalisation of business models and decision-making processes have led to calls for more transparency, but at the same time raise the question of suitable concepts for this. The contributions summarised in this volume, which address various areas of law, therefore examine from a jurisprudential perspective whether and under what conditions transparency should be granted and to what extent already existing transparency concepts can be made fruitful. They are all discussion contributions of the 2nd Conference of the Research Network Young Digital Law, which took place on 22 and 23 July 2022 at the University of Hamburg.

Dr. Tobias Mast contributes to this volume with the article "Zum Wesensunterschied menschlicher und maschineller Entscheidungsbegründungen aus rechtssoziologischer Perspektive" [On the Difference in the Nature of Human and Machine Decision-Making from the Perspective of the Sociology of Law].

 
Kuhlmann, S.; De Gregorio, F.; Fertmann, M.; Ofterdinger, H.; Sefkow, A. (eds.) (2023): Transparency or Opacity, Baden-Baden. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748936060

About this publication

Authors

Martin Fertmann

Year of publication

2023

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!