Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Autonomie und Determinismus. Was sagt das Grundgesetz zu Alltagsentscheidungen durch Software?

Autonomie und Determinismus. Was sagt das Grundgesetz zu Alltagsentscheidungen durch Software?

Publisher information (in German) 

The contribution analyses software-based decisions from a legal perspective. It focusses on the question how free users in the face of automated decisions still are, and what consequences for regulation and media pedagogy can be derived in view of the guarantee of autonomy, which is deeply nested in human rights.

Dankert, K.; Dreyer, S. (2017): Autonomie und Determinismus. Was sagt das Grundgesetz zu Alltagsentscheidungen durch Software? [Autonomy and Determinism. What Does the Basic Law Think about Day-to-Day-Decisions by Software?] In: S. Eder, C. Mikat, A. Tillmann (eds.), Software Takes Command. Herausforderungen der "Datafizierung" für die Medienpädagogik in Theorie und Praxis. [Challenges of "Datafication" for Media Pedagogy in Theory and Practice.] Munich: kopaed, pp. 85-96.

About this publication

Year of publication

2017

RELATED KEYWORDS

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!