Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Regulation of Cross-Media Concentration Processes

Regulation of Cross-Media Concentration Processes

Media are, as the Federal Constitutional Court continually emphasises in its jurisdiction, both medium and factor in public opinion-forming. The legislator is, therefore, obliged to prevent the exercise of unilateral influence on public opinion resulting from a concentration of power among publicists. This requires special precautions against the development of dominant cross-media influences on public opinion, i.e. opinion-forming through different media types. As regards the configuration of these precautions, the scope available to legislators is broad.

The PhD project investigates the question as to how cross-media concentration processes especially may be covered by regulation. In this regard, the project reviews the media-specific concentration control, which according to §§ 26 ff. RStV (Interstate Broadcasting Treaty) focuses on the prevention of dominant influence on public opinion through television, as well as antitrust merger control, which relates to the prevention of a market-dominating position with ensuing dominance in economic power.


show more

Project Description

As to the question whether the broadcast-centered system of media-specific concentration control should be applied, on one hand, the limits set by constitutional law for the scope of legislation will be explored. On the other hand, the extent to which the antitrust law, as applied through the limitation of economic power, may restrict dominant influence on public opinion, should be examined. The results of the survey will then be used to draw conclusions possibly indicating a restructuring of media-specific concentration law.


Project Information


Duration: 2009-2011

Involved persons

Regine Sprenger

Third party

Cooperation Partner

Contact person

Junior Researcher

Regine Sprenger

Send Email



Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.