Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Prevention of Dominant Influence on Public Opinion

Prevention of Dominant Influence on Public Opinion

Control of media concentration is a major element in protecting pluralism in the area of private broadcasting. It serves the execution of the requirements of constitutional law, which result from the freedom of broadcasting established by the Basic Law (art. 5 par. 1, sent. 2, Basic Law GG) and the respective jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court.

Current regulations to prevent dominant influence on public opinion focus very much on television. However, other media markets, such as radio markets, and up- or downstream markets are being considered to determine whether a company acquires a dominant influence on public opinion. Furthermore discussions are focusing on whether monitoring media concentration should be developed towards defining a comprehensive media model. In any case the question arises as to the effects different media have on public and individual opinion-forming. Also important is the question about the status of different media and their up- and downstream mediators such as news agencies, cable providers, search engines, social networks, blogs and microblogs, EPGs etc. in opinion-forming.

In order to offer a conclusion on the impact of different media and providers on public and individual opinion-forming, it is necessary to answer the fundamental question as to which processes of opinion-forming should be assessed, how they proceed and how they can be affected.

The Institute's work in the legal area includes an analysis paper, which presents and structures currently observed power shifts in public communication as well as suggestions for potential reactions of concentration law (2011, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung series). In June 2012, the Hans-Bredow-Institut organises in cooperation with the MA HSH and the Hamburg Chamber of Commerce the symposium „macht | medienmacht | meinung” [power | media power | opinion], which also touches upon vital project issues.

show more

Project Description

Control of media concentration is a major element in protecting pluralism in the area of private broadcasting. It serves the execution of the requirements of constitutional law, which result from the freedom of broadcasting established by the Basic Law (art. 5 par. 1, sent. 2, Basic Law GG) and the respective jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court.

Current regulations to prevent dominant influence on public opinion focus very much on television. However, other media markets, such as radio markets, and up- or downstream markets are being considered to determine whether a company acquires a dominant influence on public opinion. Furthermore discussions are focusing on whether monitoring media concentration should be developed towards defining a comprehensive media model. In any case the question arises as to the effects different media have on public and individual opinion-forming. Also important is the question about the status of different media and their up- and downstream mediators such as news agencies, cable providers, search engines, social networks, blogs and microblogs, EPGs etc. in opinion-forming.

In order to offer a conclusion on the impact of different media and providers on public and individual opinion-forming, it is necessary to answer the fundamental question as to which processes of opinion-forming should be assessed, how they proceed and how they can be affected.

The Institute's work in the legal area includes an analysis paper, which presents and structures currently observed power shifts in public communication as well as suggestions for potential reactions of concentration law (2011, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung series). In June 2012, the Hans-Bredow-Institut organises in cooperation with the MA HSH and the Hamburg Chamber of Commerce the symposium „macht | medienmacht | meinung” [power | media power | opinion], which also touches upon vital project issues.

Project Information

Overview

Duration: 2010-2012

Cooperation Partner

Contact person

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz
Director (Chairperson)

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg

Tel. +49 (0)40 45 02 17 0
Fax +49 (0)40 45 02 17 77

Send Mail

MAYBE YOU ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN THESE TOPICS?

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!