Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
International Declaration on Information and Democracy Adopted

International Declaration on Information and Democracy Adopted

The "International Declaration on Information and Democracy“ wants to create some sort of a constitution for the public. In her new blog article at JuWiss.de, Amélie Heldt analyses how useful this is.

An international commission consisting of journalists, Nobel laureates and members of civil society adopted the "International Declaration on Information and Democracy“ under the leadership of the non-governmental organisation Reporters Without Borders on 5 November 2018 in Paris. The declaration is reminiscent of the UN Charter of Human Rights and seeks to establish principles for a global public sphere.

The six-page document calls, for example, for the right of access to reliable information or the right to privacy within the public discourse. Part of the declaration is dedicated to those actors who play a major role in shaping digital communication nowadays. According to the text, it is their duty to respect democratic principles within communication spaces created by them.

How useful are those declarations? Amélie Heldt, junior researcher at the Hans-Bredow-Institut, writes in her new blog article on JuWiss.de that declarations like these initially face a fundamental problem. "Like the 'Charta of Digital Fundamental Rights' or the 'Declaration of Internet Freedom', the ['International Declaration on Information and Democracy'] does not have a binding effect. It could serve as a basis for an international agreement or a UN resolution but at the moment its effectiveness is based only on the personal recognition that its signatories receive in professional circles worldwide."

Heldt criticises specifically that the often used term "truth" is defined too vaguely in the new declaration. Furthermore, the declaration repeats many things that others have already demanded, which makes it lack a unique selling point. The entire analysis can be read on JuWiss.de.

(09 November 2018)


Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.