Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
15.
Januar 2021

Kommen die Killerroboter? Menschliche Kontrolle und letale autonome Waffensysteme

3. Hamburger Gesprächskreis Automatisiertes Entscheiden mit Anja Dahlmann von der Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik
This discussion group is aimed at both in-house and external lawyers. In the context of the interdisciplinary research project "Deciding About, by and Together With Algorithmic Decision Systems", it is intended to facilitate networking and exchange for those researchers who work on the automation and digitization of legal work in general and legal decision-making in particular. Both concrete questions and the major topics at the interface between practice and research will be discussed.
Registration
Please register by e-mail.
Programme
  • 12:00-12:05 p.m. Welcome Address by HBI Director Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz
     
  • 12:05-12:10 p.m. Introduction: Harte Regeln weichgespült: Besonderheiten der völkerrechtlichen Normenentwicklung [Hard Rules Softened: Particularities of the Development of Standards under International Law] (PD Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, HBI)
  • 12:10-12:40 p.m. Presentation: Kommen die Killerroboter? Menschliche Kontrolle und letale autonome Waffensysteme [Are the Killer Robots Coming? Human Control and Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems] (Anja Dahlmann, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik)
    Anja Dahlmann chairs the International Panel on the Regulation of Autonomous Weapons (iPRAW). Together with an international team, she is researching two questions: How can we define lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) and human control over the use of weapons? What are the regulatory options for this technology? The focus is on the international negotiations within the framework of the United Nations Arms Conventions, which the panel independently monitors.
  • 12:40-1:30 p.m. Discussion (Moderation: Johannes Schmees, HBI)

Infos zur Veranstaltung

Information

Adresse

Anmeldung

Contact person

Johannes Schmees
Junior Researcher Media Law & Algorithms

Johannes Schmees

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Tel. +49 (0)40 450 21 7 36
Fax +49 (0)40 45 02 17 77

Send Email

MAYBE YOU ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN THESE TOPICS?

digitale Technologien • digitalisation • Automated Decision Making Systems • Automated Decision Making

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
CI_Tetris_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung.jpg

How to improve one's research impact

Technology, (Media) Economy and Transformation: Research Impact Sprints

TETRIS is a program that aims to enhance researchers’ abilities to measure and increase the impact of their work through a combination of strategic frameworks and hands-on experiences.
CI_Ethik-der-Digitalisierung_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

Worldwide Research Project under the Patronage of the Federal President

The Ethics of Digitalisation

How can digital products and platforms be designed to protect individual freedom and promote social cohesion? The project, which is under the patronage of the German Federal President, developed answers to this question that will serve as a knowledge base for political dialogue in the international...
CI_Recht-der-Digitalität_Matthias-Kettemann_HBI.jpg

Global Communication vs. Local Legal Order

The Law of Digitality

The project investigates various fields of law in the area of conflict between global digital communication and local legal systems.
Algorithmen-1_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Herrenhausen Conference

Society through the Lens of the Digital

The Herrenhausen Conference "Society through the Lens of the Digital" explored the role of the social sciences and the humanities in a society saturated with debates on the effects of digitization.
Hans-Bredow-Institut_Kaleidoskop_Topbild.png

Perspectives of Television Use in the Digital Media Environment

The Hans-Bredow-Institut examines changes in the use of television as part of the digitalisation process. 
CI_Human-Machine-Communication.jpg

ChatGPT, LaMDA, and the Hype Around Communicative AI

The Automation of Communication as a Field of Research in Media and Communication Studies

This article aims to define the research field of "automated communication" more clearly and recommends that we should broaden our view in order to better understand the current changes in the media environment. Instead of focusing on human-machine interaction alone, social communication s...
CI_Mast_Morals+Machines Kopie.jpg

Neu erschienen

Some Black Boxes are Made of Flesh; Others are Made of Silicon

Tobias Mast's article "Some Black Boxes are made of Flesh; Others are made of Silicon" appeared in issue 2/2023 of the journal Morals & Machines. Automated decisions, especially those that work with AI, are accused of being opaque black boxes. In this article, Tobias Mast argues t...
CI_Transparency-or-Opacity.jpg

Editorship

Transparency or Opacity

Martin Fertmann, together with Simone Kuhlmann, Fabrizio De Gregorio, Hannah Ofterdinger and Anton Sefkow, has published an anthology with contributions from legal scholars on the problem of transparency in automated decision-making processes. The anthology is available as an open access publicatio...
CI_Transparency-or-Opacity_Tobias-Mast.jpg

Book Chapter

Zum Wesensunterschied menschlicher und maschineller Entscheidungsbegründung aus rechtssoziologischer Perspektive

In his contribution to the anthology "Transparency or Opacity", Dr Tobias Mast looks at the advantages and disadvantages of automated decision-making from the perspective of the sociology of law. The contribution and the entire anthology are available as an open access volum...
CI_Tiedeke_Statification.jpg

Understanding Digital Corporations as States?

Self-Statification of Corporate Actors?: Tracing Modes of Corporate Engagements with Public International Law

In order to understand the role of large digital corporations in international lawmaking on the internet from a jurisprudential perspective, Anna Sophia Tiedeke applies Michel Foucault's model of "stateification" (Étatisation). This article is published as an open access paper b...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!