Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Plattformen und ihre Verantwortung für Moderation von Inhalten

Plattformen und ihre Verantwortung für Moderation von Inhalten

Welche Verantwortung Plattformen in der Moderation der auf ihnen publizierten Inhalten haben, hat Amélie Pia Heldt in einem Interview mit dem Blog des Lehrstuhl für Digitales, Governance und Souveränität an der Pariser Sciences Po erläutert.

Den vollständigen Beitrag lesen.

Auszug
How do you think content moderation policies can be made in a legitimate way? Should social media platforms take more responsibility, or should they be made through other institutional structures? 

There are several parameters, which, in my opinion, should be considered when making content moderation policies (CMPs). First, some types of speech are restricted by law – not in all countries, such as the US, but in many. Not all speech-restricting laws meet the standards developed in deliberative democracies and can, therefore, be used as smokescreens for censorship. But when they do meet the requirements of proportionality under the most careful scrutiny, they should, in principle, be included in CMPs. Regarding CMPs that go beyond the categories of unlawful content, it is crucial to question their legitimacy because it is a notion we are less aware of in the analogue context. “In real life”, we act according to social norms which might be different from one context to another and are often implicit – something that is quite different when we communicate on social media platforms. But, maybe, it is a question of generations? Now that we communicate even more via digital tools due to the pandemic, we might develop equivalent social norms for digital communication. […]

Plattformen und ihre Verantwortung für Moderation von Inhalten

Welche Verantwortung Plattformen in der Moderation der auf ihnen publizierten Inhalten haben, hat Amélie Pia Heldt in einem Interview mit dem Blog des Lehrstuhl für Digitales, Governance und Souveränität an der Pariser Sciences Po erläutert.

Den vollständigen Beitrag lesen.

Auszug
How do you think content moderation policies can be made in a legitimate way? Should social media platforms take more responsibility, or should they be made through other institutional structures? 

There are several parameters, which, in my opinion, should be considered when making content moderation policies (CMPs). First, some types of speech are restricted by law – not in all countries, such as the US, but in many. Not all speech-restricting laws meet the standards developed in deliberative democracies and can, therefore, be used as smokescreens for censorship. But when they do meet the requirements of proportionality under the most careful scrutiny, they should, in principle, be included in CMPs. Regarding CMPs that go beyond the categories of unlawful content, it is crucial to question their legitimacy because it is a notion we are less aware of in the analogue context. “In real life”, we act according to social norms which might be different from one context to another and are often implicit – something that is quite different when we communicate on social media platforms. But, maybe, it is a question of generations? Now that we communicate even more via digital tools due to the pandemic, we might develop equivalent social norms for digital communication. […]

Infos zur Publikation

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

ÄHNLICHE PUBLIKATIONEN UND VERWANDTE PROJEKTE

Newsletter

Infos über aktuelle Projekte, Veranstaltungen und Publikationen des Instituts.

NEWSLETTER ABONNIEREN!