Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Alternative Models of Financing Investigative Journalism

Alternative Models of Financing Investigative Journalism

Ein Team um Prof. Dr. Michel Clement (Universität Hamburg / Hamburg Business School) sowie Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen untersuchten acht alternative Finanzierungsmodelle. Das Fazit der von den Grünen im Europäischen Parlament in Auftrag gegebenen Studie: alle taugen, eine Mischung wäre am besten.

Short Summary in English

This report aims to identify, evaluate, and discuss models to finance investigative journalism in the EU.

To provide a thorough evaluation, we developed a set of criteria that cover six areas to that the financial source may exert an influence from high to low degrees. Those are (1) Independence, (2) Quality, (3) Market Structure, (4) Processes, (5) Sustainability, and (6) Competitiveness. This set of criteria is applied to eight representative financing models that stretch from the classical publishing house over innovative financing to publicly supported
media. The analysis reveals that only a mixture of models allows the market to benefit best from each model’s core asset. The diversity of finance models is a natural inhibitor of market concentration, when regulative interference is well dosed. Also, the pluralistic set of finance models supports independence in that power is spread over many market actors. This must stretch out from local and regional to European and international levels.
We advocate for efficient structures to connect across those geographic entities and emphasize the importance of networks. Support in both directions on all levels (local / global) may serve as a valuable source of stabilization.

Inside organizations, low barriers between the content production and content financing side may negatively impact the degree of independent reporting. However, we find positive examples of entrepreneurial journalists who take care of the fundraising and the writing and still achieve a big contribution to the “fourth power”. Fostering transparency eases the way to monitor the sources and potential entanglements between content and its financial source.
With respect to quality, the market is in need for financial sources to support, and not distort, competition. Especially governmental activities bear the responsibility to complement private activities with the overall goal to upkeep a transparent, balanced, and diverse news market.
mehr anzeigen

Projektbeschreibung

Infos zum Projekt

Überblick

Laufzeit: 2018-2018

Forschungsprogramm:
FP1 - Transformation öffentlicher Kommunikation

Drittmittelgeber

Kooperationspartner

Prof. Dr. Michel Clement
Dr. Anke Lepthien
Petra Schulz

Ansprechpartner

Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen
Senior Researcher Journalismusforschung

Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg

Tel. +49 (0)40 45 02 17 - 91
Fax +49 (0)40 45 02 17 - 77

E-Mail senden

VIELLEICHT INTERESSIEREN SIE AUCH FOLGENDE THEMEN?

Newsletter

Infos über aktuelle Projekte, Veranstaltungen und Publikationen des Instituts.

NEWSLETTER ABONNIEREN!