Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Lisa Merten gewinnt 2021 Digital Journalism Outstanding Article Award

Lisa Merten gewinnt 2021 Digital Journalism Outstanding Article Award

Lisa Merten gewinnt den Preis für den besten Artikel des Jahres 2021 in der hochkarätigen Fachzeitschrift Digital Journalism! Sie ist damit auch eine der drei Nominierten für den Bob Franklin Award, dem gemeinsamen Preis von Digital Journalism, Journalism und Journalism Practice für den besten Artikel des Jahres. 

Bei dem prämierten Artikel handelt es sich um Block, Hide or Follow - Personal News Curation Practices on Social Media, erschienen in Ausgabe 8/2021 von Digital Journalism. Er basiert u.a. auf Daten aus dem Reuters Institute Digital News Survey, dessen deutsche Teilstudie jährlich im Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung erstellt wird.

Lisas Artikel wurde zudem für den Wolfgang Donsbach Outstanding Article of the Year Award der ICA Journalism Studies Division nominiert.

Und sie wurde dank des Preises die erste Person, die noch ohne PhD/Doktortitel (folgt aber in Kürze, Lisa hat ihre Dissertation am 21.3. mit summa com laude verteidigt) in das Editorial Board von Digital Journalism aufgenommen wurde.

Wir gratulieren sehr herzlich und sind mächtig stolz auf Lisa!

Interview mit Lisa aus dem Newsletter von Digital Journalism V10 Issue 3 International Edision:

We are delighted to feature Lisa Merten as the winner for the 2021 Digital Journalism Outstanding Article award. Lisa received an impressive number of nominations and excellent comments about her rigorous and innovative study!

What inspired your focus on the topic?

In my first project as a junior researcher at the Hans-Bredow-Institut, together with my colleagues Jan- Hinrik Schmidt and Uwe Hasebrink, I carried out qualitative interviews that explored the role of information intermediaries in our processes of opinion formation. During these interviews participants described different practices of personal news curation on social media. They talked for example about having two different Facebook accounts to separate their social newsfeed with details from their friends from their information newsfeed with content from accounts they followed. Or how they would “weed out” certain content from their Instagram feed. I have always been fascinated by the (non-)serendipitous nature of our media diets and the research on selective exposure. Kjerstin Thorson and Chris Well’s fantastic and inspiring conceptual piece on curated flows and how they shape our digital media exposure (Communication Theory 2016) provided me with a truly useful framework to further explore the practices described in the interviews. I did so by running a secondary analysis of the survey data that the Reuters Institute generously made available.

Can you tell us how this particular article in Digital Journalism came about?

I conceptualized an article on practices of personal news curation as part of my PhD on practices of social media news use. The manuscript was already starting to take shape when I became aware of the call for a special issue on engaging news audiences by Sora Park, Yoonmo Sang, Jaemin Jung, and Natalie Jomini Stroud on engaging news audiences. The special issue editors and the DJ staff and reviewers were very helpful and patient during the whole process.

In your own view, what is your article's main contribution to digital journalism studies?

In the article, I described the prevalence of personal news curation practices and identified predictors of news-limiting and news-boosting news curation. Individuals who limit their social media news exposure intentionally report general news avoidance in their day-to-day news diet. However, even those users who limit their social media news exposure report a higher quantity of news sources online as well as a more diverse repertoire of sources compared to users who do not engage in social media news curation at all.
I am thinking about these results in two different ways: First, maybe we can understand acts of news-limiting news curation as practices of general repertoire management. Maybe we can consider individual citizens to some extent as editors of their own information diets through the customization features and affordances provided by social media platforms; in essence, taking into their own hands the hitherto professional roles of editorial staff. This interpretation may offer journalism researchers an additional track to explore when investigating how practices of personal news curation shape trust and appreciation for the acts and processes of professional journalistic curation.
Secondly, based on these results I will continue to examine how best to differentiate between the varying levels of incidentality or intentionality of social media news exposure. If individuals curate ten journalistic sources into or out of their newsfeed I would not quantify their consequent (lack of) news exposure as strictly incidental. As we assume at the moment that more intentional social media news exposure leads to higher benefits in terms of knowledge acquisition and learning, we might want to start incorporating measures of news curation practices in our studies on the effects of social media news exposure.
I think integrating curation practices and other acts towards more intentional news exposure in the empirical designs could be a step forward in our understanding of often contradictory research on social media news exposure where recent studies have on the one hand conceptualized social media as a low choice media environment with beneficial network effects while other studies theorize social media as a high choice media environment with strong selectivity effects regarding exposure to political information.

What is the type of study you are most keen to see others developing in this space?

Recalling practices of personal news curation or news exposure is challenging for participants, especially on social media platforms. So I am very excited to see more studies that combine digital trace data on media exposure with qualitative and quantitative interviews that contextualize and enrich data gathered from web tracking or social media histories.

Any words to share with those interested in submitting their work to Digital Journalism?

This is probably not the most original tip but at least in the case of this manuscript, perseverance paid off. While I was preparing my manuscript submission in early 2019, Francis L. F. Lee and colleagues published a great paper with a very similar research question utilizing the same Reuters dataset I had been working on. Every PhD student’s nightmare. It took me many, many months of reworking my manuscript, adding thirty-two additional countries and running new analyses before I felt comfortable submitting the article. Even though I would not have chosen this scenario, being compelled but also being able to build on the work of Lee et al. improved my paper a lot and gave me a chance to publish in Digital Journalism



Infos über aktuelle Projekte, Veranstaltungen und Publikationen des Instituts.